Most likely one was tapped or rolled so the reeding flattened out, which adds no value; and the other was used for target practice. Wondering if the smooth-edged one has a slightly lower diameter, which is what would be expected. It's looking like you have fifty cents here!
📋 Item Submitted
One quarter has a hump in the center it’s like it has something inside the middle of the quarter and the other quarter is a good bit thicker than a normal quarter and is not as big around as a normal quarter and it caused it to not finish all the details in the center of the coin and they were printed this way not altered after being made
M
Marc's Expert Appraisal
ANA-Certified Numismatist · Hudson Valley Numismatics
Similar Appraisals
From my initial research and rifling through my coin jar, I have a small…
All are worth face value, no more. DISCLAIMER (The fine print): We have answered your question about this coin despise the fact that…
2002P lousianna quarter caught my eye because on its side no visible copper, weighs…
Edge appearance varies, this is likely a regular quarter. Doubt it's ferrogmagnetic, can you pick it up with the magnet? Otherwise probably…
1967 error quarter. Most predominant error is the bulge on the right side of…
Never heard of a bulge error before.